AI automation means putting a model inside a workflow your business already runs — scoring a lead, reading a document, drafting a reply — so a step that used to take a person twenty minutes takes nobody any minutes. It is integration work first and AI work second, and it fails when people get that order backwards.
Most teams do not need a chatbot. They need the twelve manual handoffs between their forms, their CRM, and their spreadsheet to stop being manual.
We map how work actually moves through your business, then pick the one or two steps where automation pays for itself fastest. Usually it is intake, triage, or anything that ends in someone copying data between two screens.
Your forms, CRM, database, billing, and inbox get connected with n8n or direct API integrations. This is the unglamorous part that determines whether the AI layer is useful or theatre.
Classification, extraction, scoring, drafting, summarising. The model handles judgement-shaped work inside a workflow that has guardrails, a fallback, and a human checkpoint where the stakes justify one.
An internal dashboard or a channel that shows what ran, what it decided, and what needs a human. Automation nobody can observe is automation nobody trusts.
Lynx.ai for Tiger Finance runs exactly this shape: Webflow captures the lead, n8n orchestrates, an AI valuation step scores the property, Supabase holds the record, and agents work it from a FlutterFlow dashboard.
Tiger Finance
2024
Lynx.ai is a proof of concept that brings AI into the real estate lead generation process. Webflow captures leads, n8n orchestrates the automation, Supabase stores the data, and agents manage everything from a custom FlutterFlow dashboard.
Pricing here is what real projects of this shape have cost. Your quote will be fixed in writing before anything starts.
A single well-scoped workflow — one intake, one decision step, one destination — typically lands between R25,000 and R60,000. Multi-system builds with several branching workflows and an internal dashboard usually run R60,000 to R150,000. Ongoing tuning after launch is normally a retainer rather than a project.
A focused workflow is usually running in production within two to three weeks. Anything touching more than three systems, or needing a custom interface for staff, runs closer to four to six weeks. The integration work takes longer than the AI work almost every time.
No, and you usually should not. The work sits on top of what you already run — HubSpot, Sheets, Xero, Slack, your existing site. Ripping out working systems to make room for an automation project is how these builds go over budget.
Claude and OpenAI models for language work, n8n for orchestration, Supabase or Firebase for data, and direct API integrations where a platform-neutral connection matters. Tool choice follows the problem; nothing here is locked to one vendor.
Every workflow ships with a confidence threshold, a fallback path, and a human review step wherever the cost of being wrong is real. You will also get a log of what the system decided and why, so a bad call is findable rather than mysterious.
2026
A repeatable AI video pipeline for a photoreal CGI mascot, built so the character never drifts between clips.
2026
A free, prize-backed survivor football platform rebuilt so the game engine never knows which competition it is running.
2024
A headless CMS brand style guide platform for managing and sharing brand assets across social and advertising.
Thirty minutes on a call is usually enough to work out whether this is a two-week job, a two-month job, or something you should not build at all. You get a written scope and a fixed price before anything starts.
Taking on new work from August 2026 · Replies within one business day